The State of Marriage Equality
President Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court might put LGBTQ+ rights in danger
With about three weeks left until Election Day, it’s important that we vote for politicians who will fight for equal rights for all people, including the LGBTQ+ community. Since coming out as gay in February 2012, supporting the rights for all gay and lesbian people was something that I was passionate about. Three years later, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that marriage equality was the law of the land. It was a historic day and victory for everyone in the LGBTQ+ community.
In August of this year, two important decisions were made by the Supreme Court. The first one regarding the bathroom case in Virginia. Gavin Grimm, a transgender male, sued Gloucester County in 2015, when he was a sophomore. Grimm was denied access to the boys’ restroom. A Virginia appeals court ruled that Grimm was protected under a law barring sex discrimination. The second story was about a two-year-old being denied citizenship because the girl’s birth was out of wedlock and the biological parents were never married. Later on that month, a federal court in Atlanta ruled that Simone Mize-Gregg was a U.S. citizen.
President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, has a very conservative record. If confirmed, the 48-year-old will become the youngest Justice on the Supreme Court. His nomination of Barrett is dangerous, because she is opposed to issues such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and abortion. Marriage equality is at risk of possibly being overturned. This is why I encourage everyone to go out to the polls and vote. One date to remember is November 4, the day after the election. Why is this particular day important? It’s because the Supreme Court will decide if a Catholic agency based out of Pennsylvania can reject same-sex parents from adopting children.
Former Vice President and Democratic Presidential nominee Joe Biden is the person that I’ll be voting for to become the next commander-in-chief on Election Day. I believe that he’ll fight for the rights of all people, including the LGBTQ+ community. If President Trump gets re-elected for another four years, the rights of LGBTQ+ people will be in jeopardy. He’s not the right person to lead our country. In fact, for the last four years, he’s divided this country even further, refusing to condemn white supremacy in the first presidential debate with Joe Biden, made derogatory comments about Mexicans and other minorities, and so on. We need a leader who will condemn racism and hate on all forms. We need someone who will actually bring this country together.
LGBTQ+ rights is something that I talk about on a regular basis, because I don’t want my fellow brothers and sisters to be discriminated against, just because of who they are. I want them to live happy and prosperous lives. Biden and Senator Kamala Harris will fight for our rights and make this country better than Trump did. Whether you’ll be voting by mail or in person on November 3, your voice matters and important. Hatred, racism, and bigotry has no place in the United States of America.
I’m now on TikTok: @thecosplayerfromtexas. I’m always in need of new followers. Mention that you’ve found me on Vocal and I’ll follow back. Please check it out and enjoy my videos. Also, be sure to follow me on social media. The info to all of my social media pages can be found in my bio. If you enjoyed any of my articles, including this one, please feel free to send me a one-off tip, which is located at the end of every article. No tip is ever too big or small. It'll help me and other Vocal content creators to write better stories. Lastly, I encourage everyone to join Vocal+, a premium membership for Vocal content creators like myself to write better stories, connect with creators, and a lot more. So be sure to sign up for that membership and support your favorite Vocal content creators. Thanks in advance for your support of me and hopefully, I’ll see you on social media.
About the Creator
Mark Wesley Pritchard
Award-winning cosplayer, cosplay model, influencer, retro gaming fanatic, die-hard Texas Rangers fan, and nostalgic freak. Need I say more?
Threads: @thecosplayerfromtexas
Instagram: @thecosplayerfromtexas
TikTok: @thecosplayerfromtexas
Enjoyed the story? Support the Creator.
Subscribe for free to receive all their stories in your feed. You could also pledge your support or give them a one-off tip, letting them know you appreciate their work.
Keep reading
More stories from Mark Wesley Pritchard and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Silence Is Never An Option
2020 has gone off to a rough start. The coronavirus pandemic currently has over 17 million cases. On top of that, the loss of jobs, high unemployment, numerous cancellations of large events, and so on. It has also taken the lives of over 150,000 people in the United States.
By Mark Wesley Pritchard4 years ago in The Swamp
A game of "Rules for thee and not for Me" pt3
The My Lai Massacre, one of the most heinous crimes committed during the Vietnam War, saw the brutal slaughter of over 500 Vietnamese civilians, including women, children, and the elderly, at the hands of American soldiers. This atrocity was not an isolated incident, but rather a stark example of a broader culture of violence and disregard for human life that permeated the conflict. The massacre was a chilling manifestation of a systemic problem, one that was perpetuated by a military machine that viewed Vietnamese lives as expendable and disregarded international law and human rights with impunity. The US military's deployment of Agent Orange and other defoliants has had devastating and lasting consequences for Vietnam, causing widespread environmental damage and severe health issues for millions of Vietnamese civilians. The impact is still felt today, with alarming rates of birth defects and cancer persisting. Additionally, the intense bombing campaigns, such as Operation Rolling Thunder, resulted in significant civilian casualties and infrastructure destruction. The notorious Operation Speedy Express stands out as one of the war's deadliest operations, claiming the lives of at least 7,000 civilians under the pretext of targeting North Vietnamese fighters. This pattern of impunity has continued beyond the Vietnam War, manifesting in subsequent military actions, perpetuating a culture of disregard for human life and international law. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been plagued by extensive civilian casualties and war crimes, with the US-led coalition facing allegations of indiscriminate attacks, torture, and extrajudicial killings. The widespread use of drone strikes in countries like Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia has resulted in numerous civilian deaths, with little transparency or accountability. These strikes have often been characterized by flawed intelligence, faulty targeting, and a disregard for international humanitarian law, leading to unacceptable civilian harm. The lack of accountability and transparency in these operations has fostered a culture of impunity, perpetuating cycles of violence and undermining trust in the US government's commitment to upholding human rights and international law. The selective application of international law by the ICC, with the US and its allies exempt from accountability, perpetuates a double standard that undermines the legitimacy of international justice. While the ICC has prosecuted individuals from weaker states, it has failed to investigate and prosecute war crimes committed by the US and its allies, creating a culture of impunity. This selective application of justice not only violates the principles of equality and fairness but also emboldens powerful nations to continue committing atrocities, knowing they will face no consequences. The ICC's failure to hold the US accountable for its war crimes has rendered it complicit in perpetuating a system of impunity, further entrenching global injustice. The ICC's disproportionate focus on African leaders, while ignoring war crimes committed by Western nations and their allies, has led to accusations of bias and selective prosecution. The court's pursuit of cases against Sudan's Omar Al-Bashir, Kenya's William Ruto, and Uganda's Joseph Kony, among others, has not been matched by similar efforts to hold Western leaders accountable for their actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other theaters. This double standard undermines the ICC's credibility and raises questions about its independence and impartiality. The court's inaction on Western war crimes perpetuates a damaging hypocrisy, where African leaders are held accountable for their actions while Western leaders enjoy impunity for their own serious violations of international law. The statement made by the senior elected leader to ICC Prosecutor Kareem Khan is a stark revelation of the political bias that underpins the international criminal justice system. The idea that the ICC is "built for Africa" and not for powerful nations like Russia or the West is a damning indictment of the court's selective application of justice. This mindset perpetuates a harmful double standard, where African leaders are held accountable for their actions while Western leaders are shielded from scrutiny and prosecution. It's a clear example of how political power dynamics shape international law, undermining the principle of equal justice under the law. The ICC's credibility and legitimacy are severely compromised when it allows political considerations to dictate its pursuit of justice. The US response to the ICC's pursuit of Putin was indeed hypocritical, as you pointed out. When the ICC attempted to investigate Russian war crimes in Ukraine, the US supported the effort, but when the court turned its attention to Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank, the US vehemently opposed it. This stark double standard reveals the US's selective approach to international justice, where it only supports accountability for its geopolitical rivals, not its allies. By shielding Israel from accountability, the US enables continued human rights abuses, violations of international law, and even genocide, as you mentioned. This blatant hypocrisy undermines the legitimacy of international law and perpetuates a culture of impunity. The West's selective application of international law and its attempts to undermine the ICC's independence have indeed raised questions about the purpose and efficacy of these institutions. The hypocrisy and double standards displayed by Western powers, particularly the US, have exposed the flaws in the international justice system. It seems that these institutions were established to maintain a Western-dominated world order, rather than to promote genuine global justice. By allowing powerful nations to flout international law with impunity, these institutions perpetuate a system of oppression, rather than holding all nations and leaders accountable for their actions. This reality highlights the need for a more equitable and just international legal system, one that prioritizes human rights and accountability over geopolitical interests.
By Ekeke Divine Favourabout 3 hours ago in The Swamp
Oliver Dowden: Russian Interference!
We all remember the alleged interference in the American Presidential elections alleged by Trump's enemies. That may have helped Trump to come to power. How could Russia interfere in an election and achieve its aims? Use social media, Russian agents residing in that foreign country to big up the party or candidate they back, Russian use of bots or AI, etc.
By Nicholas Bishop5 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.